Tariff Exclusion Intelligence

Live processes

Which US tariff actions accept product-specific requests, who may file, on what cycle, and whether outcomes are published. Verified against primary sources on 2026-09-09.

The short answer: none of them. No live US tariff action currently operates a product-specific exclusion request process that publishes per-request outcomes.

The map

ActionStatusRequest path for an importer?Outcomes published?
§301 China
technology transfer, 2018
tariffs live
179 exclusions in the schedule (USTR's notice said 178)
No new-request process. Only USTR-initiated extension comment dockets on exclusions already granted.No per-request decisions
§301 forced labor
60 economies, eff. 24 Jul 2026
live No — expressly refused. Exemptions are set by USTR in Annexes I/II by HTSUS subheading. In the tariff schedule as U.S. note 52 — headings 9903.05.20–9903.05.99 and 9903.06.01–9903.06.21. Corrected 2026-09-10: this row briefly said the action was absent from the schedule.No per-request outcomes exist
§301 Brazil
25%, eff. 22 Jul 2026
live No request process identified. Exemptions fixed in HTSUS 9903.05.02–9903.05.09.No
§232 steel & aluminium — exclusions closed 10 Feb 2025 Closed. Existing exclusions run to expiry or volume exhaustion; General Approved Exclusions revoked 12 Mar 2025.Historical only
§232 — inclusions
steel/aluminium and auto parts
live Reverse direction. Domestic producers petition to add products to tariff scope. An importer's only role is to object, in a short window. Yes — determination memoranda with rationale, on regulations.gov. Auto parts opens a new docket per window
§301 machinery exclusions
docket USTR-2024-0020
closed 31 Mar 2025 Closed. 1,111 request forms remain publicly readable. See what was argued. No — none was ever published
§301 China — second four-year review live, phase two pending Not yet. Continuation requests (domestic industry only) closed 5 Jul and 22 Aug 2026. Phase two would open comments to all interested parties. Comment dockets are public
IEEPA tariffs struck down 20 Feb 2026 Not applicable — the tariffs themselves were held invalid.A refund process, not an exclusion process

What USTR said when it was asked for an exclusion process

Certain comments recommended the Trade Representative establish an exclusion process… Establishing an exclusion process that would result in lowering of tariffs on additional products would be inconsistent with the President's direction.

Notice of Actions in Section 301 Investigations, 28 July 2026 (FR doc 2026-15181), §III.G

USTR received over 1,600 written comments and held hearings over three days. The section addressing requests to add products to the exemption list is titled Determination Not To Exempt Additional Products.

The dates that matter

A note on the last item. Phase two of the first four-year review is what produced the machinery exclusion process. That is a statement about what happened before, not a forecast of what will happen now.

This page is generated from the project's process map, which carries the full source citations and records which items were verified against a primary notice and which rest on secondary summaries. Map document length: 253 lines.